Sheep

Structurally this looks like a clean graduated Pump.Fun token: LP locked, mint authority revoked, no tax, no honeypot, RugCheck flagging zero risks, and liquidity of ~$64k against a ~$296k cap (~22%) is unusually healthy for this size. The main unresolved issue is source disagreement on distribution \u2014 RugCheck reports 7,737 holders and 30.7% in the top 10 while Birdeye and GMGN independently agree on ~1,710 holders and 20.8% top-10, so the real float is likely thinner and more concentrated than the friendliest reading suggests. Trade flow is net distributive (3,460 sells vs 2,769 buys across 1,234 traders), meaning the honest read is a technically sound token where early holders are quietly selling into a still-liquid market rather than an outright rug setup. Deployer history is entirely absent, so the single largest unknown \u2014 whether this creator has serial launches behind them \u2014 cannot be assessed at all.

• ⚠ Holder count differs by ~4.5x: RugCheck reports 7,737 while Birdeye (1,709) and GMGN (1,711) closely agree on roughly 1,710 \u2014 the two-source agreement suggests RugCheck is counting token accounts or historical holders rather than current unique holders
• ⚠ Top-10 holder concentration reported as 30.75% by RugCheck vs 20.85% by GMGN, a ~10pp spread that materially changes the concentration read (moderate vs low risk)
• ⚠ RugCheck simultaneously reports the highest holder count and the highest concentration, which is internally odd \u2014 more holders should normally dilute top-10 share, hinting its holder figure is inflated by non-current accounts

AI reasoning over the combined data above — catches contradictions between sources that the flag-based score can't see on its own.